and atomic scale—has also become a
big concern to many in the organic
industry. In spring 2009, the NOSB
heard public comment on a discus-
sion document regarding the use of
nanotechnology and the products of
nanotechnology in the organic indus-
try. The majority of those who offered
comments requested a complete pro-
hibition of nanotechnology (and
products resulting from it) in certi-
fied organic production and process-
ing. Because of this, in fall 2009, the
NOSB considered adding nanotech-
nology to section 205.105 of the or-
ganic regulation as a “prohibited
technology.” This recommendation
did not intend to include nano-sized
particles inadvertently created in tra-
ditional processing technology such
as homogenization or flour milling;
however, there was confusion as to
whether the definition of “nanotech-
nology” was clear in that case. This
recommendation was not voted on by the full Board because of dis-
agreement over the definition of the term “nanotechnology,” which
would impact how the prohibition is applied.
Production Issues
The NOSB has continued to consider a number of production issues as well, including animal welfare issues related to the organic rule.
At the fall 2009 meeting, the Board passed an extensive animal welfare
recommendation, which reviewed the sections in the rule dealing with
livestock living conditions and health care practices. The recommendation included language to prevent or minimize overcrowding and
addressed other factors that contribute to the health and natural be-
(continued on page 50)
3:24: 40 PM
